會見小城里關心動物保護里長
今天，我陪同政大研究生研究生周艾欣前往新北市小城里，旁聽她對一位動物保護負責人的訪問。他是所在區最早推行這種模式的負責人之一。我從未去過新北，所以看到那裡的景色和環境與台北截然不同，感到非常驚訝。關心動物保護里長非常忙碌，所以我們的談話時間有限。
這次訪談是我上週旁聽他與研究生談話的延續。我從訪談中了解到的另一個有趣的事實是，如果能透過將社區辦公室與領養站結合，當領養數量已經達到了收容所的容量，從而減少了新建收容所的需求。
然而，領養站的主要目的是展現社區願意推廣愛護動物的概念，並為領養者牽線搭橋，推廣領養計畫。與其說是動物實際居住的地方，不如說更像是聚會場所。
他們從事動物保護工作已有十餘年，最初專注於為流浪貓絕育，甚至自掏腰包。他們還與新店的動物收容所建立了合作關係，幫助照顧小貓，作為交換，收容所會幫助他們為動物絕育。他們的工作很大程度上依賴志願者，他們透過培訓、閱讀貓科書籍、參加講座和研討會等方式，幫助志願者更全面地了解貓。
他提供政治支持、協調和資源，而志工們則專注於他們熱衷的工作。儘管該計畫已取得良好成效，但他認為，由於大多數人仍然保留著傳統的觀念，只想把動物趕走，因此該計畫僅在少數里（1032多個里中僅有20個）實施。他還建議，提供更多激勵措施可以吸引更多人參與該項目，類似於環境保護項目為自願參與者提供獎勵的做法。
他提到一項旨在鼓勵村長解決流浪狗問題的計劃，如果村長幫忙安置轄區內的流浪狗，就能獲得資金支持。然而，該計劃並未對已經表現良好的社區提供任何補貼。在情況介紹會上，大多數與會者都是來自表現優異地區的村長，而非來自表現欠佳地區的村長。這暴露了該計劃的一個關鍵政策缺陷。這讓我意識到，在製定政策倡議時，需要考慮目標受眾是誰，如何有效地與他們互動，以及如何獎勵那些已經為政策目標做出貢獻的人。
Meeting with the Animal Protection Chief of Xiaocheng Village, New Taipei City
Today, I accompanied Zhou Aixin, a graduate student from National Chengchi University, to Xiaocheng Village in New Taipei City to observe her interview with an animal protection leader. He is one of the earliest leaders to implement this model in his district. I've never been to New Taipei City, so I was quite surprised to see how different the scenery and environment are compared to Taipei. The animal protection chief is very busy, so our conversation was limited.
This interview was a continuation of my observation of his conversation with the graduate student last week. Another interesting fact I learned from the interview is that by combining community offices with adoption stations, the need to build new shelters is reduced when the number of adoptions reaches the capacity of the shelters.
However, the main purpose of the adoption stations is to demonstrate the community's willingness to promote animal welfare and to connect adopters with potential owners, promoting the adoption program. It's more like a gathering place than a place where animals actually live.
They have been working in animal protection for over ten years, initially focusing on sterilizing stray cats, even paying for it out of their own pockets. They also partnered with animal shelters in Xindian to help care for kittens, in exchange for the shelters helping them spay/neuter their animals. Their work relies heavily on volunteers, who gain a more comprehensive understanding of cats through training, reading feline books, and attending lectures and workshops.
He provided political support, coordination, and resources, while the volunteers focused on their passion. Although the program has been successful, he believes it has only been implemented in a few neighborhoods (only 20 out of over 1032) because most people still hold traditional views and only want to get rid of the animals. He also suggested that providing more incentives could attract more people to participate in the project, similar to how environmental protection projects reward volunteers.
He mentioned a program designed to encourage village chiefs to address stray dog problems, offering financial support if they help relocate stray dogs in their jurisdictions. However, this program did not provide any subsidies to communities that had already performed well. At the briefing, most attendees were village chiefs from high-performing areas, not those from low-performing areas. This exposed a key policy flaw in the program. This made me realize that when developing policy initiatives, we need to consider who the target audience is, how to effectively engage with them, and how to reward those who have already contributed to the policy objectives.
沒有留言:
張貼留言